USPTO serial 78254629
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin G. Smith
KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION, PLLC.STE 8002100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, NAMELY HUMAN RESOURCES SCHEDULING ANT) CONDUCTING EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE AWARD PROGRAMS TO PROMOTE PRODUCTIVITY;BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANCY; COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE; PROVIDING ADVICE IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; RECORDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTERIZED DOCUMENT FILE INDEXING FOR OTHERS; AND CONDUCTING BUSINESS AND MARKET RESEARCH SURVEYS VIA COMPUTER | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS AMONG USERS OF COMPUTERS CONNECTED VIA FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT TELECOMMUNICATIONS; AND PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES ON BEHALF OF INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL COMPANIES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ADVICE REGARDING THE MANAGEMENT OF COMPANY COMPUTER INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE PACKAGE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; UPDATING OF REGISTERED COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT IN THE NATURE OF CONDUCTING STUDIES FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND MODIFICATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANCY IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SECURITY AND COMPUTER SECURITY SOFTWARE;INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER NETWORK DESIGN FOR OTHER COMMERCIAL ENTITIES; COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY,PROVIDING ADVICE REGARDING THE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ADVICE CONCERNING THE IMPROVEMENT, MODIFICATION, MIGRATION AND USE OF COMPUTER NETWORK CONFIGURATIONS; AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |