Drawing for EASY TRIM

USPTO serial 78256125

EASY TRIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EASY TRIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ADAM K SACHAROFF

ADAM K SACHAROFF MUCH SHELIST FREED DENEBERG AMENT ET AL191 N WACKER DR STE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008pedicure and manicure implements namely nail files, nail clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, nail and cuticle scissors and cutters for humans and animalsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Oct 24, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Oct 24, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 24, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 10, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Mar 4, 2005IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Feb 10, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 8, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 4, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jul 6, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 7, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 6, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 21, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance