Drawing for MEDIALIVE

USPTO serial 78263093

MEDIALIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIALIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Sacoff

ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed goods and printed matter, namely, a series of periodicals and quantitative and qualitative research studies in the fields of computers, information technology and publishingACTIVE—
035Organizing and conducting live events, and trade shows, expositions and conferences in various fields, namely, computers, communications and information technology; advertising and promoting the goods and services of others by means of the Internet, trade shows, expositions and conferences in the various fields, namely, computers, communications and information technologyACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, electronic message services, electronic transmission and reception of data and of information, electronic messaging services, sponsoring and operating online message boards for the exchange of information in the fields of computers, communications and information technology; on-online services for the collection, transmission, delivery and supply of electronic communicationsACTIVE—
041Arranging, conducting and managing workshops and/or seminars in the fields of computers, communications and information technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 2, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance