USPTO serial 78264077
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RANDY S MILLER
RANDY S MILLER DARBY & DARBY PCPO BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Computer services, namely, providing information regarding and in the nature of on-line dating and introduction services; providing an on-line computer database storing data about individuals consisting of the relationships between the individuals, their contact information, personal characteristics, namely, skills, hobbies, interests, educational information, career information, health information, dating information, results of self assessment tests, and other personal information; computer dating services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 15, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |