USPTO serial 78264242
JEAN TONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JEAN TONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
MICHAEL J MACDERMOTT CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | APPAREL, NAMELY, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, BASEBALL CAPS, BATHING SUITS, BATHING CAPS, BATHROBES, BEACHWEAR, CLOTHING BELTS, BERMUDA SHORTS, BLAZERS, BLOUSES, BODY SUITS, BOOTS, BOW TIES, BOXER SHORTS, CAPS, CARDIGANS, CHEMISES, COATS, COVERALLS, DRESSES, FOOTWEAR, GLOVES, GOLF SHIRTS, HALTER TOPS, HATS, HEAD WEAR, HEAD BANDS, HOSIERY, JACKETS, JEANS, JERSEYS, JOGGING SUITS, KNIT SHIRTS, LEG WARMERS, LINGERIE, MINISKIRTS, MONEY BELTS, NECKTIES, NEGLIGEES, OVERALLS, OVERCOATS, PANTS, POLO SHIRTS, SANDALS, SARONGS, SCARVES, SHIRTS, SHOES, SHORTS, SKIRTS, SLACKS, SNEAKERS, SOCKS, SPORT COATS, SPORT SHIRTS, SUITS, SWEATERS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWIMSUITS, T-SHIRTS, TROUSERS, TURTLENECKS, UNDERWEAR, AND VESTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |