Drawing for LA FAMOUS

USPTO serial 78264582

LA FAMOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3703548Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 27, 2009
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with LA FAMOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas E. Roszak

4420 MADISON AVENUEKANSAS CITY, MO 64111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Tortilla chipsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2016C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Oct 27, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 20, 2009REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 9, 2009CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Sep 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 18, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 30, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 10, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2008CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 1, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 6, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 3, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 1, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 1, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 11, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Jun 20, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 20, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Mar 19, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 1, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Mar 1, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 2, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 21, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 22, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 18, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 18, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 25, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 12, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance