USPTO serial 78267313
TORQUE STAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TORQUE STAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Idaho Falls, ID
Idaho Falls, ID
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monte L. Falcoff
MONTE L FALCOFF HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLCSTE 400 5445 CORPORATE DRTROY, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | luggage; travel bags, namely, backpacks, helmet bags, map pouches, motorcycle and ATV saddle bags, motorcycle and ATV fuel tank bags, motorcycle and ATV tail bags, trunk bags, handlebar pouches, windshield bags, backrest bags, and duffle bags | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, jackets, shirts, T-shirts, pants, shorts, vests, racing suits of the type used while riding a motor vehicle, undergarments, scarves, chaps, gloves, and hats | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |