Drawing for PAIN RELIEF FOOTWEAR

USPTO serial 78267663

PAIN RELIEF FOOTWEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAIN RELIEF FOOTWEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RAY R. REGAN

RAY R REGAN CORRALESLAW OFFICE OF RAY R REGAN PAP O BOX 1442, NM 87048

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear, shoes, shirts and hatsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 13, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 23, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 8, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Oct 27, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Aug 25, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jun 29, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 4, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Apr 4, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 5, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Apr 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance