USPTO serial 78269027
BUSH HOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUSH HOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan B. Flohr
SUSAN B FLOHR BLANK ROME LLPWATERGATE 600 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | eyewear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |