USPTO serial 78273995
AFFINITY GROUP THE RESOURCEFUL BUSINESS PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- PRE-PUBLICATION FINAL REVIEW
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AFFINITY GROUP THE RESOURCEFUL BUSINESS PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Lafkas
DAVID M LAFKAS7811 LAUREL AVECINCINNATI, OH 45243UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Professional services, namely, employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services; business project management; business management consultation; business consulting services relating to distribution solutions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |