Drawing for SIMPLY FIT

USPTO serial 78274037

SIMPLY FIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLY FIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dorie Choderker

DORIE CHODERKER LAW OFFICES OF DORIE CHODERKER2ND FL1901 AVE OF THE STARSLOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recording discs, audio cassettes, compact discs, CD-Roms, digital video discs, video cassettes and laser discs featuring exercise, nutrition, health, cooking and diet advice, exercises, workouts and cooking instructions; eyeglasses, sunglasses, eyeglass and sunglass cases, frames, cords and chains, decorative magnets; pocket calipers for measuring, body fat measuring apparatus.ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 13, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 6, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 6, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 8, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 20, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 24, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance