USPTO serial 78276858
SIPS AUTHENTICATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIPS AUTHENTICATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oakville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Eisen
MARK B EISEN DIMOCK STRATTON CLARIZIO TORONTO; ONC - ONTARIOM5H 3R3STE 3202 BOX 102 20 QUEEN ST WES,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Debit cards, magnetically coded; bank cards, magnetically coded; automated teller machine cards, magnetically coded; Internet credit cards, magnetically coded; Internet debit cards, magnetically coded; credit cards, magnetically coded | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Credit card services; credit services, namely, extending credit in Internet transactions based on buyer authentication; debit card services; electronic debit transaction services; commercial and consumer lending services; financial clearing house services; banking services including financial and foreign currency exchange services; and credit inquiry and consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |