Drawing for ESQUE

USPTO serial 78278157

ESQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Logsdon, Registration No. 22,132

WILLIAM H LOGSDON REGISTRATION NO 22 WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG 436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated pet grooming products, namely, shampoos and conditionersACTIVE
005Medicated grooming preparations for pets, namely, shampoos and lotionsACTIVE
018Pet supplies and accessories, namely, cat scratching posts, pet apparel, pet carriers, and natural rawhide chewsACTIVE
020Pet housing and furniture, namely, pet kennels, pet play houses, portable beds for pets, pet cushions, pet pillows, plastic lids for cans, and non-metal pet ramps for elderly petsACTIVE
021General household products, namely, pet feeding dishes, storage containers for household use, food scoops, combs for pets, brushes for pets, pet cages, cat and dog litter boxes, and pet cratesACTIVE
028Pet toys, namely, synthetic bones and toysACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 8, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance