USPTO serial 78278296
IN THE MAILBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IN THE MAILBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen E. Owczarski
Karen E. Owczarski United States Postal Service475 L'Enfant Plaza, SWWashington, DC 20260-1136UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DVDs, namely, DVDs featuring audio, music, movies, a wide variety of informational subjects and games; blank video cassettes; video tapes featuring audio, music, movies, a wide variety of informational subjects and games; all excluding DVDs and video tapes featuring materials in the field of pedagogy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |