USPTO serial 78282729
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Saccocio
RICHARD M SACCOCIO LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M SACCOCIO100 SE 12 STFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hand held electronic reference device of gardening information such as descriptions of indoor and outdoor vegetation, plants, flowers, trees, shrubs, grass, ground cover, weeds, herbs, vegetables, light and water requirements, growing seasons, suitable growing locations, fertilizing and other helpful information for healthy plants, diseases and their prevention and treatment, soil requirements, and other information relating to planting and plants | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |