USPTO serial 78283996
THE LOGIC GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3445113Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2008
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE LOGIC GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fleet GU13 8QT, GB
LOGIC GROUP ENTERPRISES LIMITED, THE
FLEET, HAMPSHIRE GU51 35 B, GB
Other trademarks owned by LOGIC GROUP ENTERPRISES LIMITED, THE
LOGIC GROUP ENTERPRISES LIMITED, THE
FLEET, HAMPSHIRE GU51 35 B, GB
Other trademarks owned by LOGIC GROUP ENTERPRISES LIMITED, THE
LOGIC GROUP ENTERPRISES LIMITED, THE
FLEET, HAMPSHIRE GU51 35 B, GB
Other trademarks owned by LOGIC GROUP ENTERPRISES LIMITED, THE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick H. Rabin
FREDERICK H RABIN FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers and electronic apparatus, namely, computer servers, computer peripherals; electronic apparatus for encoding, reading or verifying encoded cards or data carriers in the nature of cards; cards and data carriers in the nature of cards, namely, magnetically encoded banking cards for credit or debit purposes, cards encoded with security features for authentication or identification purposes, magnetically encoded cards for cash dispensers, magnetically encoded cards for use as charge cards; encoded electronic chip cards (smart cards) containing programming used to validate the card holder; encoded electronic chip cards (smart cards) for use as banking cards for credit or debit purposes; encoded electronic chip cards (smart cards) containing programming used to hold a monetary value; encoded electronic chip cards (smart cards) containing programming used for authentication or identification purposes; magnetically encoded cheque guarantee cards; electronic apparatus for the storage, handling, switching or transmission of video or of data; structural and replacement parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisaba Group Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by LOGIC GROUP ENTERPRISES LIMITED, THE
- Other trademarks owned by LOGIC GROUP ENTERPRISES LIMITED, THE
- Other trademarks owned by LOGIC GROUP ENTERPRISES LIMITED, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named THE LOGIC GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | NEWR | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS APPROVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |