USPTO serial 78287052
NETWORK FRONTIERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETWORK FRONTIERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | non-fiction books on a variety of topics; series of non-fiction books in the fields of computers, computer networking, computer hardware and software and electronic data and risk management and regulatory compliance; books in the fields of computers, computer networking, computer hardware and software and electronic data | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 1992 |
| 041 | conducting workshops and seminars in the fields of computers, computer networking, computer hardware and software and electronic data | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 1992 |
| 042 | computer hardware and software consultation; computer network consultation; consultation services in the field of electronic communications networks namely, consultation in the field of regulatory compliance; computer disaster recovery services; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; providing information in the fields of computers, computer networking, computer hardware and software and electronic data via electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Network Frontiers LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Network Frontiers LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NETWORK FRONTIERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 15, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |