Drawing for CODE BREAKER DAY ONE

USPTO serial 78287744

CODE BREAKER DAY ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CODE BREAKER DAY ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Hwang, Esq.

MONICA B RICHMAN BROWN RAYSMAN MILLSTEIN FELDER & STEINER900 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer controller for video games, computer software for use with video games, hand-held home video game consoles, video game cases, video game accessory cases, steering wheels for video games, video game controller, racing wheel for video games, video game cartridges, video game cassettes, video game disks, video game equipment containing memory devices, video game joy sticks, video game tapes, video hardware, video cables, video carrying cases, video game interactive control floor pads or mats, video game interactive remote control units, video game joy sticks, video game accessories, and video game software, CD's and disks; Computer software to facilitate users access to cheat codes in computer gamesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Apr 15, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 7, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
Jan 9, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 16, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 9, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 30, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 24, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Aug 24, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 24, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 21, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 7, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance