USPTO serial 78287796
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Boulogne, FR
Boulogne, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus, devices, equipment, namely, computer hardware, processors, and digital signal processors, for image processing; computer programs and digital image processing integrated circuits for image processing, for the improvement of the quality of digital images, and for the improvement of the optical qualities of cameras, scanners, fax machines, phonecams, endoscopy apparatus, echography apparatus, video conferencing apparatus, projectors, display monitors, printers, photofinishing equipment, and televisions; digital imaging devices, namely, cameras, scanners, fax machines, phonecams, video conferencing apparatus, namely, video cameras, video monitors, computers, computer software for video conferencing, modems, microphones and audio speakers, projectors, display monitors, printers, photofinishing equipment, namely, computer hardware, software, and peripherals for controlling photofinishing processing; automatic processors for processing exposed photographic film and paper; photographic negative and positive printers; photographic image printers; and televisions | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Photographic reproduction; digital enhancement of photographs; electronic or digital processing of images; and digitizing, alteration and retouching of images | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy and technical research in the field of the technology for the analysis and processing of images with a computer means; design, tests for the development of new products using this technology | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |