USPTO serial 78288100
STAR BLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STAR BLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Sprinkle
ALLYN TAYLOR DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP2000 UNIVERSITY AVEEAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2248UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Self contained mobile broadcasting system comprised of light emitting diodes, projection screens of various sizes, audio and visual components, namely, cameras, amplifiers, and video projectors and an automated mechanized lifting arm for raising LED projection screens | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicles, namely, trucks; hydraulic equipment, namely, vehicle mounted hydraulic lifting arm for use in a self contained mobile mounted broadcasting sytem | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, T-shirts, hats, visors and jackets | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and computer software problems in connection with vehicle mounted mobile broadcasting systems; custom design and development of self contained, vehicle mounted, mobile broadcasting sytems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GTECX Systems
- Other trademarks owned by GTECX Systems
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STAR BLAST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |