USPTO serial 78288366
HEINEKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEINEKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO, CA
NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert V. Marcon
ROBERT VICTOR MARCON3471 SINNICKS AVENIAGARA FALLS, ON L2J 2G6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat juices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |