USPTO serial 78288521
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sallynoggin, Co. Dublin, IE
Sallynoggin, Co. Dublin, IE
Sallynoggin, Co. Dublin, IE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith A. Weltsch
KEITH A WELTSCH SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER400 GDN CITY PLZ STE 300GARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Topical haemostatic wound treatment materials for human first aid use, namely, sticking plasters for medical use, wound dressings, sprays, dissolvable strips to stop bleeding from minor cuts and grazes, powders, pads in the nature of bandages for skin wounds, plugs in the nature of nasal sponges for skin wounds, creams and gels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 23, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |