Drawing for LOGICALIS

USPTO serial 78290162

LOGICALIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2934200Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 15, 2005
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOGICALIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. SCOTT KELLER

R SCOTT KELLER WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP111 LYON ST NW STE 900FIFTH THIRD CTRGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2487

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, consulting in the field of computer hardware and software, integration of computer systems, network management, information technology, and maintenance of computer software for othersSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDNov 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2005C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Jul 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 20, 2005C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Jun 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 15, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 9, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 6, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 1, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Nov 30, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 12, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Nov 12, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 25, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 1, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 10, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance