USPTO serial 78293001
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
A. Croteau Ltd. Inc./A. Croteau Ltée
Montréal (Quebec), CA
Other trademarks owned by A. Croteau Ltd. Inc./A. Croteau Ltée
LES MAGASINS UREKA INC./UREKA STORES INC.
MONTREAL (QUEBEC), CA
Other trademarks owned by LES MAGASINS UREKA INC./UREKA STORES INC.
LES MAGASINS UREKA INC./UREKA STORES INC.
MONTREAL (QUEBEC), CA
Other trademarks owned by LES MAGASINS UREKA INC./UREKA STORES INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M. COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body soap, bath salts, and essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | household accessories and decoration items, namely, vases, wastepaper baskets, candleholders not of precious metal, glass boxes, lunch boxes; tableware and dishes, namely, dinner plates, cups, bowls, and meal trays; glassware, namely, glasses, wine glasses, decanters, carafes; kitchenware, namely, mixing bowls, fondue sets, salt and pepper grinders, teapots, knife blocks, non-electric coffee makers, bread baskets, butter dishes, sauce dishes, sugar dishes, cream dishes, seafood ware, namely, escargot dishes; salad bowls; cooking ware, namely, pans, cauldrons, sieves, draining racks, oil and vinegar wares, namely, cruets not of precious metal; bathroom accessories, namely, towel racks, soap dishes, toothbrush holders, soap pumps, wicker baskets | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | bed linens, namely, sheets, bed skirts, pillow cases; dish cloths, textile table cloths, textile napkins and placemats; shower curtains | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing for men, women and children, namely, hats, scarves, t-shirts, sweatshirts, shirts, bodysuits, overalls, aprons, jackets, neckties, coats, raincoats, gloves, mittens, caps, jogging suits, dresses, evening dresses, pajamas, bathrobes, pants, short pants, bras, underwear, undershirts, socks, skirts, nylon stockings, pullovers, vests, sweaters, belts, knitwear, namely, shirts and slacks, jeans, bathing suits | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |