USPTO serial 78294453
DREAM BUNNY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DREAM BUNNY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded audio cassettes and compact discs featuring music, stories, games, and activities; prerecorded video cassettes and DVDs featuring movies, music, games, and animated entertainment; and computer software for video game machines. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 20, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 20, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |