USPTO serial 78294750
WHALE-MAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3013903Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 8, 2005
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHALE-MAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Print Management Partners, Inc.
DesPlaines, IL
Print Management Partners, Inc.
DesPlaines, IL
Print Management Partners, Inc.
DesPlaines, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES GRANDOS
JAMES GRANDOS HOGAN & HARTSON LLP8300 GREENSBORO DRIVE SUITE 1100ATTN BOX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYMCLEAN, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Online document delivery that allows users to e-mail large files to recipients via a global computer network | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Print Management Partners, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Print Management Partners, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Print Management Partners, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named WHALE-MAIL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |