USPTO serial 78294937
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anil V. George
Anil V. George NBA Properties, Inc.Legal Dept. - Intellectual Property Grp.645 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10022| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing and performance sports apparel, namely hosiery, footwear, basketball shoes, basketball sneakers, T-shirts, shirts, sweatshirts, sweat pants, pants, tank tops, jerseys, shorts, pajamas, sport shirts, rugby shirts, sweaters, belts, ties, nightshirts, hats, warm-up suits, warm-up pants, warm-up tops, jackets, wind resistant jackets, parkas, coats, cloth baby bibs, head bands, wrist bands, aprons, boxer shorts, slacks, caps, ear muffs, gloves, mittens, scarves, woven and knit shirts, cheerleading dresses and uniforms | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |