Drawing for HISAMITSU LIFECELLA MOISTURIZING MASK VEGETABLE COLLAGEN

USPTO serial 78294975

HISAMITSU LIFECELLA MOISTURIZING MASK VEGETABLE COLLAGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2979211Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 26, 2005
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with HISAMITSU LIFECELLA MOISTURIZING MASK VEGETABLE COLLAGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH ST STE 3200, POPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely skin care products for moisturizing, hydrating, cleansing and exfoliating the skin; skin lotions; skin moisturizers, sun screen preparations; skin creams, beauty masks; make-up preparations; creams for hands, face and body; toilet watersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 10, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Apr 26, 2006A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Apr 26, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Aug 22, 2005AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Aug 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 3, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 20, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Apr 14, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 25, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Mar 25, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 28, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 16, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance