Drawing for KAZAA

USPTO serial 78295070

KAZAA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAZAA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARVIN H KLEINBERG

MARVIN H KLEINBERG KLEINBERG & LERNER LLP2049 CENTURY PARK E STE 1080LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3150UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for use in communicating among computers, searching and indexing other directories of other computers, retrieving and sharing data and files among computers and searching the internet; computer software for searching and retrieving information, sites, files, documents, web pages, video and audio content on computer networks; computer software for retrieving, downloading and sharing computer files, namely, documents, sound recordings, picture and moviesACTIVE
025Clothing, namely, men's, women's and children's footwear, shoes, hats, caps, shirts, pants, T-shirts, jackets, sweat shirts, sweat pantsACTIVE
038Providing on-line facilities via a web site for interaction with other computer users, namely, providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning topics of general interest; broadcasting programs via a global computer network; webcasting services; streaming of audio and video material on a global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 2, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 3, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 30, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 23, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 22, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 22, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 10, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 4, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 8, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Sep 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance