USPTO serial 78295600
TAINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Coconut Creek, FL
Coconut Creek, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott R. Austin
Scott R. Austin Gordon & Rees LLP1441 Brickell AvenueFour Seasons Tower 15th FloorMiami, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | CIGARS | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |