Drawing for SO, YOU THINK YOUR BUTT CAN SING?

USPTO serial 78295628

SO, YOU THINK YOUR BUTT CAN SING?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SO, YOU THINK YOUR BUTT CAN SING??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Cone

JOHN M CONE AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPPO BOX 688DALLAS, TX 75313-0688UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services in the nature of radio and television programs featuring amateur singers competing in singing contestsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
May 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 28, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance