USPTO serial 78295720
PAMPERED BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAMPERED BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Mark Dickison
J MARK DICKISON LAWSON & WEITZEN LLP88 BLACK FALCON AVE STE 345BOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care preparations, namely, shampoos and conditioners; skin care products, namely, skin lotions, bath foams, body sprays, skin moisturizers, hair and body rinses, cosmetic preparations for skin care, and skin creams | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | retail shop-at-home party services in the field of hair care products and skin care products | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |