Drawing for VON DUTCH

USPTO serial 78295767

VON DUTCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VON DUTCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Hwang

Susan Hwang Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600Los Angeles, CA 90067-6017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Alarm Clocks, ashtrays of precious metal, body piercing rings, body piercing studs, bracelets, charms, cigarette lighters of precious metal, clocks, earrings, jewelry, necklaces, pocket watches, rings being jewelry, wall clocks, watch bands, watch cases, watch fobs and watchesACTIVEJun 15, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Nov 11, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
May 20, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
May 20, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
May 19, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 17, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 12, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 12, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 2, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance