USPTO serial 78295767
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
ROYER BRANDS INTERNATIONAL S.A.R.L
GRAND-DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG, LU
Other trademarks owned by ROYER BRANDS INTERNATIONAL S.A.R.L
ROYER BRANDS INTERNATIONAL S.A.R.L
GRAND-DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG, LU
Other trademarks owned by ROYER BRANDS INTERNATIONAL S.A.R.L
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Hwang
Susan Hwang Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600Los Angeles, CA 90067-6017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Alarm Clocks, ashtrays of precious metal, body piercing rings, body piercing studs, bracelets, charms, cigarette lighters of precious metal, clocks, earrings, jewelry, necklaces, pocket watches, rings being jewelry, wall clocks, watch bands, watch cases, watch fobs and watches | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 20, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |