USPTO serial 78295780
HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara Quinn
BARBARA QUINN THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VIS STBURBANK, CA 91521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Dinnerware; beverage glassware; beverageware; plastic coasters; coasters not of paper and not being table linen; removable sleeve holders for drink cans and bottles; lunch kits consisting of lunch boxes and thermal insulated containers for food and beverages; meal trays and serving trays not of precious metal; hair brushes and hair combs; toothbrushes; figurines of china, crystal, earthenware, glass, porcelain or terra cotta; plastic cups; cookie jars; paper cups; paper plates | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |