Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78296068?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78296068. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns COAXIAL TRANSFORMER TECHNOLOGY?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78296068, the listed owner(s) include: Lincoln Global, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78296068?

Serial number 78296068 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark COAXIAL TRANSFORMER TECHNOLOGY. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of COAXIAL TRANSFORMER TECHNOLOGY?

COAXIAL TRANSFORMER TECHNOLOGY (78296068) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover COAXIAL TRANSFORMER TECHNOLOGY?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78296068

COAXIAL TRANSFORMER TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Sep 4, 2003
Status date: Oct 31, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office: LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COAXIAL TRANSFORMER TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Lincoln Global, Inc.
Monterey Park, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lincoln Global, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert V. Vickers

ROBERT V VICKERS FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE, LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE SEVENTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Electric arc welders and power supplies therefor	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 21, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 31, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 31, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Aug 15, 2007	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Feb 20, 2007	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED	—
Feb 19, 2007	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Dec 21, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Nov 14, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Oct 16, 2006	RECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED	—
Oct 16, 2006	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Sep 1, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Aug 29, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 29, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 3, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Mar 13, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 13, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 19, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2005	ZZZX	PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN	—
Sep 19, 2005	PBCR	WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY	—
Jun 23, 2005	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jun 13, 2005	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
May 27, 2005	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Apr 20, 2005	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Mar 17, 2005	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jan 27, 2005	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Dec 21, 2004	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Dec 21, 2004	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Nov 19, 2004	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Nov 10, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 2, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 21, 2004	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 3, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 25, 2004	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—