Drawing for GRIVAL

USPTO serial 78296244

GRIVAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3174753Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2006
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with GRIVAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie Bertagnolli

Leslie Bertagnolli BAKER & MCKENZIE300 East Randolph Street, Suite 5000Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011plumbing products, namely, water mixing valves for showers, sinks and laundry sinks, entry and exit valves for toilets, and valves for control and passage of waterSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 4, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 1, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2006CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 13, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 13, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 14, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 8, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 20, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance