USPTO serial 78296658
AMSCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMSCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis T. Griggs
DENNIS T GRIGGS GRIGGS BERGEN JOHNSTON LLPSTE 100017950 PRESTON RDDALLAS, TX 75252Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | buckets and parts therefor, namely, clam shell type, ditcher, hoe, ladder-type dredge, orange peel type, conveyor, elevator and loader types; power shovel dipper parts, namely, dipper bucket points and adaptors for dipper buckets; racking; stone grapples; centrifugal dredge pumps and parts therefor; slushing scrapers, and dredge tumblers; apron feeder parts, namely, pans, links, pins, sprockets, idlers and rollers; grate bars; grizzly bars; bearing bushings; bearings; bedplates for paper stock beaters; blades for ballast spreaders, bulldozers and road graders; cams; catheads; conveyor and power-transmission chains and links, pins, and attachments therefor; chutes and parts therefor; driving clutches; crusher concaves, jaws and mantles; hoisting and winding drums; conveyor flights; gears and pinions for machinery; tractor grousers; conveyor gudgeons; wire-rope guides; pulverizer hammers and rings; tamping roller heads; liners for crushers, grinding mills, mixers, pulverizers, pumps and tumbling barrels; log-dogs; log turners; paddles for log washers, mixers and sintering machines; conveyor pans; screening machinery plates and machine wearing plates; rollers, namely, bucket-ladder, conveyor, incline, kiln, mooring-chock, towline and tractor types; rolls, namely, anvil, briquette, crusher, forging and grinding types; roll-crusher shells; screws for spiral conveyors; shoes for snow-plows and sweepers; teeth for buckets, crusher rolls, clinker grinders, rippers and scarifiers; teeth repointers; stamp-mill parts, namely, dies, shoes, tappets; wheels for conveyors, bridge and monorail type cranes, sawmill carriages, and aerial tramways; crown, gear, idler, kicker, pinion, sheave, sprocket, traction and trolley wheels for machinery; treads for tractor and power-shovel crawlers; precipitation baffles; bearing rings and rollers," in International Class 7. | ACTIVE | Mar 8, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |