Drawing for PURWELD

USPTO serial 78296684

PURWELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3188638Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 26, 2006
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with PURWELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric Westerberg

Eric Westerberg HENKEL CORPORATIONONE HENKEL WAYLAW DEPARTMENT - TRADEMARKSROCKY HILL, CT 06067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001one-component liquid polyurethane adhesives for non-structural applications for engineered woodACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jul 1, 2025EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Jul 1, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Jul 1, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 1, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED
Mar 25, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 25, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 17, 2017EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Feb 18, 2017PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9
Feb 18, 2017PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9
Feb 18, 2017PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9
Feb 17, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 16, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Dec 26, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
May 8, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED
May 8, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 8, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 25, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 26, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 14, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 14, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Nov 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 5, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 8, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 6, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
May 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 16, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance