Drawing for GLOBAL REACH-LOCAL EXPERTISE

USPTO serial 78296747

GLOBAL REACH-LOCAL EXPERTISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLOBAL REACH-LOCAL EXPERTISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amanda Pecchioni Thompson

AMANDA PECCHIONI THOMPSON BARNES & THORNBURG LLP750 17TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035lawyer referral services; information clearinghouse services in the legal fieldACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Aug 3, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2006PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Oct 25, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 11, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 6, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Oct 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance