USPTO serial 78296777
TRAFFIC LOGIC INTELLIGENT SEARCH MARKETING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRAFFIC LOGIC INTELLIGENT SEARCH MARKETING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Marina Del Rey, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine L. McDaniel
KATHERINE L MCDANIEL KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMAN2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 2600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | TRAFFIC LOGIC will be used for all printed material, web site promotion and company identity; The use of the mark will identify the company in all areas of business | ACTIVE | Feb 4, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |