USPTO serial 78296926
MALIBU PIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MALIBU PIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Agoura Hills, CA
Agoura Hills, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, hats, caps, visors, headwear, shirts, T-shirts, tank tops, Hawaiian shirts, aloha shirts, surf shirts, athletic jerseys, team jerseys, sweaters, jumpers, pullovers, jackets, vests, ponchos, parkas, sweat shirts, sweat pants, trousers, coveralls, overalls, pants, shorts, jeans, footwear, socks, robes, pajamas, nightshirts, nightgowns, underwear, aprons, wetsuits, surfing suits, swim suits, bathing suits, skirts, dresses, sundresses, beach wraps, and mittens | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |