USPTO serial 78297189
KIDSTRUCTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2007
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with KIDSTRUCTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Austin, TX, US
PLAYGROUND & SHADE STRUCTURES, INC
Hutto, TX, US
Other trademarks owned by PLAYGROUND & SHADE STRUCTURES, INC
Austin, TX, US
PLAYGROUND & SHADE STRUCTURES, INC
AUSTIN, TX, US
Other trademarks owned by PLAYGROUND & SHADE STRUCTURES, INC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Greenberg
David Greenberg Coleman Greenberg Business Law3200 Fort Worth TrailAUSTIN, TX 78748United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Children's play equipment, namely, climbing units for use in playgrounds and parks | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alexius, Britt
- Other trademarks owned by PLAYGROUND & SHADE STRUCTURES, INC
- Other trademarks owned by Alexius, Britt
- Other trademarks owned by PLAYGROUND & SHADE STRUCTURES, INC
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named KIDSTRUCTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 27, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 27, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |