Drawing for LENOX

USPTO serial 78297497

LENOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3187875Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 19, 2006
Examiner
EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with LENOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott B. Markow

Scott B. Markow Irwin Industrial Tool Company701 East Joppa RoadPatent Dept., TW199Towson, MD 21286

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004LUBRICANT FOR USE WITH HAND TOOLSACTIVEMay 1, 2003
008HAND TOOL ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, BAND SAW BLADES, JIG SAW BLADES, HAND SAWS AND HAND SAW FRAMES, HOLE SAWS, AUGER BITS, PORTABLE BAND SAWS, UTILITY KNIVES AND PIPE CUTTERSACTIVEOct 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Apr 3, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
May 23, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Sep 27, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 27, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 27, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 8, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Oct 22, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED
Feb 7, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Feb 7, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 19, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 23, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 16, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Oct 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 29, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 12, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Sep 12, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 4, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 2, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 17, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Feb 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance