CopyMark Law Group
4.9
Drawing for CZX

USPTO serial 78298263

CZX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3017271Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 22, 2005
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CZX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobile chassis, spokes for land vehicle wheels, wheel rims for vehicles, axle bearings for land vehicles, structural parts for trucks, namely, tipping apparatus, brake linings for land vehicles, tires for land vehiclesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2022C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jul 8, 2022CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 7, 2022CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jan 5, 2022PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 12, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2015RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 3, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 3, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 20, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 23, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 20118.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 7, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2010ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 30, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance