Drawing for LOHMANN

USPTO serial 78298436

LOHMANN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3274152Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with LOHMANN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. Bruce Hamburg

C. Bruce Hamburg Norris McLaughlin, P.A.7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Industrial adhesive tapes, single sided or double faced, and die cut or otherwise converted industrial adhesive tapes and industrial packing tapes, for use in the automotive, metal, plastics, furniture, printing, packaging, electrical, electronic, textile, paper manufacturing and processing industries; Adhesive tape for industrial useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Feb 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Dec 5, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 5, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 3, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 22, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Aug 7, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
May 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED
Nov 23, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 23, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 12, 2013815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Nov 12, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 27, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 27, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 16, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 16, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 16, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 22, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Nov 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 9, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 9, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 5, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Nov 28, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 3, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 3, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Oct 25, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 25, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 5, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance