USPTO serial 78298588
NO SLIP HAIR ACCESSORIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2974845Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NO SLIP HAIR ACCESSORIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Hair accessories, namely, barrettes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by No Slippy Hair Clippy, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by No Slippy Hair Clippy, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NO SLIPPY HAIR CLIPPY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named NO SLIP HAIR ACCESSORIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 26, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |