Drawing for FOS FOCUS ON STANDARDS

USPTO serial 78298654

FOS FOCUS ON STANDARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FOS FOCUS ON STANDARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LILE H. DEINARD

LILE H DEINARD DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP15 TH FL 250 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10177UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for collecting and analyzing data concerning student performance and assisting educators and administrators in designing and implementing instructional plansABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 21, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 21, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 21, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 1, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 1, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance