Drawing for DYNAMIC NETWORK ARCHITECTURE

USPTO serial 78298852

DYNAMIC NETWORK ARCHITECTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAMIC NETWORK ARCHITECTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. Goldschmidt

John W. Goldschmidt Dilworth Paxson LLP1500 Market StreetSuite 3500EPhiladelphia, PA 19102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for providing managed remote access services, namely, for providing secure, general purpose connectivity so that a variety of computer software applications and computer network-based services, file sharing services, e-mail services, and intranet services can be securely accessed by a user connecting remotely to the enterprise LANACTIVE
038Providing managed remote access services, namely providing secure, general-purpose connectivity so that computer software applications and computer network-based services, file sharing services, e-mail services, and intranet services can be securely accessed by a user connecting remotely to the enterprise LANACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 13, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 27, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 27, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 25, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 25, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance