USPTO serial 78299009
--PERSEPOLITAN--
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3146207Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2006
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with --PERSEPOLITAN--?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ political and cultural issues journal appearing in both the English and Persian languages ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 2006 |
| 029 | [ Meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, vegetables and fruits which have been dried, frozen, prepared or packaged; applesauce and fruit preserves ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 2006 |
| 041 | Development and dissemination of educational and entertainment materials in the field of cultural appreciation and awareness for usage in broadcasting, cable casting, web casting and tape and disc distribution | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 2006 |
| 043 | Restaurant and Café and Catering services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by d'Last Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by d'Last Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by d'Last Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named --PERSEPOLITAN--
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 31, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2013 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |