Drawing for RUTGERSENSIS-IN NOVA-CAESAREA-SIGILLUM-COLLEGII-SOL-IUSTITIAE-ET-OCCIDENTEM-ILLUSTRA

USPTO serial 78299611

RUTGERSENSIS-IN NOVA-CAESAREA-SIGILLUM-COLLEGII-SOL-IUSTITIAE-ET-OCCIDENTEM-ILLUSTRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUTGERSENSIS-IN NOVA-CAESAREA-SIGILLUM-COLLEGII-SOL-IUSTITIAE-ET-OCCIDENTEM-ILLUSTRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce H. Sales

Bruce H. Sales LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction at the undergraduate and graduate levels and providing courses in continuing educationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jul 26, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 31, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 31, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 1, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 26, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 15, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 26, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 26, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance